Search For
 

 
Discussion Groups: Brandon Chatter


Topic: Death Threats - Serious
0 Like(s)   


Page< Prev12
 
 
  Advertisement
 
Healthy Hugs

1/15/2013 10:18:02 AM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
Media Allegations vs Death Threats - Serious

Wow - as I read on here it really amazes me that the BPS so quickly responded and commenced an investigation re alleged social media allegations and yet Death Threat files just get closed.  
 
This amazingly gives the impression that Death Threats really are not worthy of investigations! But that kinda of in conflict with the news releae on behalf of BPS on CTV on January 7th late news by Constable Burgess (Media).  
 
Serious or Not?????????????  
 

slurpeegirl

1/15/2013 4:05:53 PM
Member since:
Feb 2010
Total posts:1176
just a theory.....

maybe the case was closed because the police/prosecutors recognized that the "victim" was just seeking attention.  
 
i have often been curious as to why a woman would go running back to these kind of men. i'm sure everyone else does wonder to a certain degree. is it an addiction to all of the coddling that happens afterward, from friends, family, coworkers and the staff at the women's shelter?  
 
imagine the costs associated with this type of dysfunction......  
 
he beats her up, spends some time in jail, while she gets medical treatment and goes to the women's shelter, they each get a freebie lawyer, cfs houses the kids (if any), this plays out in court over a long and expensive period of time, at the expense of the taxpayers. THEN SHE GOES BACK TO HIM FOR ANOTHER ROUND!!!!!  
 
imagine how it is for everyone involved, at the hospital, courthouse, women's shelter and police station, to have to listen to the same old broken record over and over again. after awhile, you have to admit that some people can't be helped - no matter how cheap, free or easy to access the help may be.  
 
anyone not wishing to take any advice from the professionals, deserves to be left to sort out their problems for themselves.

Sassenach

1/15/2013 5:24:45 PM
Member since:
Sep 2009
Total posts:558
You're right...

  
Khakipants said "Rosie, I remember the past discussion thread you created, however you had a different username. I put two and two together as you had issues with "broken bones" and "lawyers siding with an abusive husband" and all "without predjudice"...In the end, anyone with any sense of reality determined that you were moreless a nut....you were looking for attention and blamed everyone but yourself for your problems. You wanted your husband to pay you more money because he has a good job and you were unemployed or something because you didn't feel like working. You were looking for a lawyer because the courts were against you and apparently all of Brandon's lawyers were against you....Oh I remember this topic real well from before.  
 
My original opinion of "you likely encouraged it" and "you needed someone to knock some sense into you" still stands.  
 
Its been several years since the break up, Grow up and get over it. "

I thought these posts sounded familiar... Shortsweet is at it again.  
 
Seek legal counsel, not a public forum where you will not get the answers you want.

Positivebabii

1/15/2013 6:34:49 PM
Member since:
Aug 2012
Total posts:229
Bahaha

Let me guess Rosie ur name is Debbie, u know nothing of the law u harass lawyers and their firms because u are to cheap to pay for services. Or u have been sued by them for non payment stop airing all your dirt cause if u didn't realize it hurts YOU it can all be used against u in court to show u are not all there!

Oryx

1/15/2013 7:21:51 PM
Member since:
Jul 2005
Total posts:5275
RosieGirl

please provide us with a link to the story you are talking about on January 7th. Thanks. Maybe that will make you more believable?

Healthy Hugs

1/15/2013 11:55:02 PM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
to Oryx - Link

  
Oryx said "please provide us with a link to the story you are talking about on January 7th. Thanks. Maybe that will make you more believable? "

Please note date is the 8th not 7th - typo  
 
Here is the link you sought  
 
http://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/brandon-teen-arrested-after-facebook-death-threat-1.1105159

Healthy Hugs

1/16/2013 12:08:33 AM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
Dear Amusedone

  
Amusedone said "Let me guess Rosie ur name is Debbie, u know nothing of the law u harass lawyers and their firms because u are to cheap to pay for services. Or u have been sued by them for non payment stop airing all your dirt cause if u didn't realize it hurts YOU it can all be used against u in court to show u are not all there! "

Air dirt - not sure that posting actual info of real situation is what some people are familiar with circumstances view as dirt and with reference to not all there - check the link re the news release - as an example that these posts do have merit.  
 
To cheap to pay for services - well maybe that is your idea - and know nothing of the law - really is that why their is information on how to file documents on website and actually forms on line for a person to use.  
 
Harass lawyers and firms - well I guess when a lawyer representing a person bills you for over 17 adjournments at the beginning of a filing of notice of motion - yes I think a person should question such charges or fees. Ethical right???  
Oh and better yet - how about if a lawyer files a document not representing you or what you are seeking - Ethical right????  
 
The fact remains this has nothing to do with whether death threats should be treated seriously or should they involved the closing of files even when their is evidence to substantiate the facts.  
 
You can guess what ever name you so choose - the fact remains this is an open forum discussion and it is an opportunity for readers to read and post relevant to the initial topic - Death Threats - Serious - the first two initial posts or those following relevant to the topic.  
 
Thanks Amusedone!  
 

HankV

1/16/2013 9:28:46 AM
Member since:
Jul 2012
Total posts:105
Attention seeking

Your second posts says your amazed that no one has the courage to reply to your first post.  
 
My mamma always said not to jump into a conversation unless you have some value to add.  
 
Well here is my value and my opinion.  
 
I believe you are just seeking some form of attention and want to be at the center of something (anything). As of writing this post you have made 50% of the 39 posts in this thread. Always complaining about how "this woman" was wronged and blaming BPS for it, then slamming anyone who has a difference of opinion. You keep reference other events from other agencies as your argument which would have no bearing on the case in question.  
 
Give us proof of the events includung that BPS did absolutely nothing and maybe more people will chime in. Hearsay is not admissable in a court of law.  
 
You want advice, please tell "the woman" to seek professianal help for this situation.  
 
My 5 cents worth. (inflation)

slurpeegirl

1/16/2013 10:55:06 AM
Member since:
Feb 2010
Total posts:1176
it looks like you'll be fine!!

  
RosieGirl said "
  
Amusedone said "Let me guess Rosie ur name is Debbie, u know nothing of the law u harass lawyers and their firms because u are to cheap to pay for services. Or u have been sued by them for non payment stop airing all your dirt cause if u didn't realize it hurts YOU it can all be used against u in court to show u are not all there! "

Air dirt - not sure that posting actual info of real situation is what some people are familiar with circumstances view as dirt and with reference to not all there - check the link re the news release - as an example that these posts do have merit.  
 
To cheap to pay for services - well maybe that is your idea - and know nothing of the law - really is that why their is information on how to file documents on website and actually forms on line for a person to use.  
 
Harass lawyers and firms - well I guess when a lawyer representing a person bills you for over 17 adjournments at the beginning of a filing of notice of motion - yes I think a person should question such charges or fees. Ethical right???  
Oh and better yet - how about if a lawyer files a document not representing you or what you are seeking - Ethical right????  
 
The fact remains this has nothing to do with whether death threats should be treated seriously or should they involved the closing of files even when their is evidence to substantiate the facts.  
 
You can guess what ever name you so choose - the fact remains this is an open forum discussion and it is an opportunity for readers to read and post relevant to the initial topic - Death Threats - Serious - the first two initial posts or those following relevant to the topic.  
 
Thanks Amusedone!  
 
"

you are soooo much more educated on the law, than the rest of us are. you can represent yourself. especially considering your claims of being shafted, in so many ways, by lawyers. why not show them up? do it right yourself, instead of letting someone else screw things up for you.  
 
you speak as though you have proof, witnesses and documentation, so you have nothing to worry about.  
 
a CREDIBLE person defends themselves, with their head held high, because they know that the truth will prevail. their friends and family will back them up, because they have been a good person and are worth the effort.  
 
a DESPERATE, ATTENTION SEEKING person will start a discussion that will never solve anything. they will change their user name to hide. they will find themselves fighting their battles alone, because their bad choices have likely caused their support people to abandon them.  
 
how long do you think the average person will help someone that refuses to help themselves? even a lawyer, who is paid a wage to do a job, has to eventually admit that they are wasting their time. especially when it turns out that the person seeking the service is not paying the bills.  
 

Positivebabii

1/16/2013 11:34:36 AM
Member since:
Aug 2012
Total posts:229
big joke

You are crazy that is the concensus of all your threads u start. You know nothing of the law you yell at court house staff because you know nothing then state it's their fault you harass lawyers who I can't believe haven't told you to take a leap. Wy start threads and act like you are so educated and know so much when it's all delusional and a waste of time for anyone. You obviously can't get lawyers or police to believe your bull so you come on here to start threads to some how validate yourself. You need some counseling obviously please seek help.

Healthy Hugs

1/17/2013 9:08:40 AM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
To Amusedone - Big Joke??

  
Amusedone said "You are crazy that is the concensus of all your threads u start. You know nothing of the law you yell at court house staff because you know nothing then state it's their fault you harass lawyers who I can't believe haven't told you to take a leap. Wy start threads and act like you are so educated and know so much when it's all delusional and a waste of time for anyone. You obviously can't get lawyers or police to believe your bull so you come on here to start threads to some how validate yourself. You need some counseling obviously please seek help. "

The concensus - you are free to speak your idea - but not all people whether on this site or not will agree with you.  
 
You seem to be implying a great deal of knowledge on your post - "Yelling at court house staff" really I do not believe that the female has ever once yelled at court house staff - she would speak loudly enough to be heard - yes - but not yell.  
 
Harass lawyers - I do not believe that for a person to speak of actually circumstances that that is fairly referred to as harassment. But once again you are so entitled to your ideas.  
 
The thread was started with respect to death threats but you seem to have an underlying bitterness to some of the items that have been posted - There is an old saying - The truth hurts! and sorry if the postings seem to be triggering some real anger issues for you.  
 
All delusional and waste of time - Well in my opinion the information for which RosieGirl has posted with reference to a situation involving a female is very not a delusional issue. But you are entitled to your opinion. Have you looked in a mirror lately to see if you might find someone with delusional issues in front of you?  
 
Bull you call it - well once again you can call it whatever you so choose - Amusedone - but documents and transcripts are more accurate than your anger and accusations on here. I do sincerely hope you find it in your schedule to seek some counseling services as I do believe you have some issues dealing with someone speaking the truth!! In the event that you are unaware of where to get such may I recommend - The Counselling Centre - located on 9th Street across from Provincial Building - they do have both male and female counselors available or maybe you may wish to sign up for an Anger Management session with the John Howard Society - I do believe there office is located on 8th Street. Best wishes to you!!  
 
And remember the intent of the post was to get people's opinions as to whether death threats - are serious and if so should they be handled in such a manner. ProActive rather than Reactive - lessen the risk of requiring investigations following the closure of files and unnecessary loss of lives!  
 
May you find peace with issues that seem to really be affecting you to post such accusations towards a person speaking up of the truth in order that situations such as Death threats may be handled with sensitivity, dignity and respect and in context of facts and history of the people involved!  
 
Have a Good Day!!  
 
 
 

Positivebabii

1/17/2013 9:17:30 AM
Member since:
Aug 2012
Total posts:229
jnsane

Debbie u r flipping insane and now that your talking third person about yourself it makes u look even more crazy. You need some serious help. I have no anger laughing at it u just get more ridiculous u changed your username to post if everything was so serious and death threats why stay with the guy that's the crazy part not like u were with him for a year. Crrraaaaaaaazzzxy person

Healthy Hugs

1/17/2013 9:28:59 AM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
To Mr. Maluga

Did send you message in response to your private message.

Pita

1/17/2013 9:46:08 AM
Member since:
Jul 2009
Total posts:924
IMO

It is my opinion that we are actually only hearing one side of this whole sad mess.  
 
I have faith in BPS and the powers that be that they probably did an investigation and the findings were such that the information given warranted no further action and the file was closed.  
 
Instead of ranting on eBrandon, try focusing your energy on a more productive outcome. If you feel strongly that you are being treated unjustly....file a complaint with the Law Enforcement Review Board. If you think that a lawyer has treated you wrongly or with bias...file a complaint with the Manitoba Law Society. Heck, if need be....complain to the Human Rights Commission...but do something if you must instead of trying to find answers you won't get on eBrandon.  
 
Rambling on this forum, like others have indicated, is not helping you with your anger.  
 

Healthy Hugs

1/17/2013 9:50:52 AM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
To Amusedone

  
Amusedone said "Debbie u r flipping insane and now that your talking third person about yourself it makes u look even more crazy. You need some serious help. I have no anger laughing at it u just get more ridiculous u changed your username to post if everything was so serious and death threats why stay with the guy that's the crazy part not like u were with him for a year. Crrraaaaaaaazzzxy person "

Your are entitled to call a person insane if you so choose.  
 
Talking (writing) in third person is a style of writing - check it out!  
 
Usernames can be changed for various reasons and I guess you assume whatever you wish!  
 
If you are unaware of the reasons why women stay in abusive relationships for many years - and yes some do go back and even up to 13 times following the initial leaving - but some such as this female - once she left she knew not to go back for her safety!  
 
More than a year??? for sure prior to this person leaving her spouse she was with him for like over 25 years - has adult children - and I am positive that she would not ever want the children to ever take on some of the behaviors which they witnessed into their future relationships.  
 
And for clarity to the readers - the death threats - which have been referred to in these postings occurred after the female left the abusive relationship and the transcripts of court despite this was not proceedings with respect to the death threats - they definitely were relevant to the reason why the female left the marriage and the circumstances associated with her having done so for her safety.  
 
Once again - Death Threats - Serious??  
 
You are leading me to think that you do not view death threats as serious - and you are entitled to your opinion, but I will ask you - if you had your life threatened would you be implying that you would be crazy in speaking up??  
 

Positivebabii

1/17/2013 10:12:59 AM
Member since:
Aug 2012
Total posts:229
haha

Your a nut job you talk as if you are so educated talking third person makes you look ridiculous when everyone knows the"victim" is you. If u were with him for over 25 years and he was abusing u and u stayed that is pure stupidity a man lays his hands on me once I'm gone especially if I have children. You are coming in ebrandon to rant because you are not successful in your court proceedings. You did not even use proper lingo when discussing paper work lawyers filed. Grow up your only trying to discuss death threats because of your situation I have a huge respect for law enforcement obviously they saw no threat or your pure craziness came off that's why they did not help you!!!!! If I was so serious why arent you harassing them instead of begging for attention here ridiculous

Khakz

1/17/2013 11:07:02 AM
Member since:
Apr 2005
Total posts:1628
Debbie...

Read this article from today's Winnipeg Sun. The headline is very clear:  
 
"Supreme Court of Canada: Not a crime for man to threaten girlfriend if that's how he normally speaks to her"  
 
http://www.winnipegsun.com/2013/01/17/supreme-court-of-canada-not-a-crime-for-man-to-threaten-girlfriend-if-thats-how-he-normally-speaks-to-her

Healthy Hugs

1/17/2013 1:17:15 PM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
To Khakipants

  
Khakipants said "Read this article from today's Winnipeg Sun. The headline is very clear:  
 
"Supreme Court of Canada: Not a crime for man to threaten girlfriend if that's how he normally speaks to her"  
 
http://www.winnipegsun.com/2013/01/17/supreme-court-of-canada-not-a-crime-for-man-to-threaten-girlfriend-if-thats-how-he-normally-speaks-to-her "

Thank You for the interesting read -  
 
Question - so if a man can admit to physically having hit his wife and abusing her and testifies such under oath in a court of law in Manitoba - then that means we should ignore death threats - well not sure I can agree in my opinion on this process.  
 
All through my life I have had great respect for those of authority but the circumstances for which I have seen some in authority make decisions or members of the court conduct themselves and some may choose to ignore facts or overlook some details - now those are leaving me to question the integrity of some.  
 
 
 

Healthy Hugs

1/17/2013 1:50:16 PM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
To Doug

I do agree that  
"Too many files get closed without the i's dotted and the t's crossed" - a prime example is that dear little girl who lost her life as she slipped through the CFS system- file closure - Wow!  
 
Interesting statement you write - "In the case of a life when lost, someone should answer for that. If no one is there with an answer or takes responsibility a complete house cleaning of people and or systems should happen ASAP."  
I am still of the opinion that being Proactive in protecting citizens is a better avenue than having to be Reactive to incidents, injuries and or deaths!  
 
If appointed members representing the Justice System of this province choose to minimize what is heard in a court of law - then it can leave a person wondering the value or integrity of laws in the province or country. And unless people speak up of actual circumstances/incidences or situations to the general public then it just simply gets swept under the carpet and no one knows of such. So yes to some of you it is more important to critique the person posting rather than actually for one minute evaluating in your own mind and conscience if you think death threats should be handled with sincerity - and if this poster is true with the information in the transcripts, and the written statements provided to BPS then do you really think the file should have been closed.  
Is that what you as a citizen understand the justice system to be or for how those with positions of authority - implementing legislation with respect to the law should conduct themselves in ensuring the safety of all citizens??  
 
This is not a matter of a person being angry and speaking up but rather the person and those familiar with the situation/and conduct of some professionals to definitely be left in awe in how some professionals choose to conduct themselves.  
 
To speak up and create awareness is not to seek sympathy but rather to have people aware that not all death threats get handled with the same dignity.  
 
Wonder how many closed files there have been over that years that needed to be re-opened due to lives being lost and that someone spoke up and questioned after their death??? I have not researched any stats on this one - but if someone has any stats - you may care to post - this is called creating awareness to members of society  
 
 

Healthy Hugs

1/17/2013 2:27:43 PM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
Thank You

In life I have learned or heard two very valuable statements - There are people who will speak up and will subject themselves to be criticized (angry, loon, needing psychiatric help, counseling needed) such as on some of these posts - but then their are those who choose to say and do nothing - and hey they will not be subjected to criticism or being accused of having done wrong.  
 
So as I reflect on some of these posts I do not regret for one minute in having started this discussion as it has brought out some interesting comments towards the poster - but the poster simply wrote of actual incidents and circumstances for which she was of the know.  
 
Does it really matter what the person's name is? Does it really matter what the poster's name is?  
 
What does matter is how death threats are handled and how maybe not all citizens of the city of Brandon were aware of how one incident was handled - not quite the same as what was aired on a news release by the news media personnel Const. Ron Burgess or what is available for print on their website.  
 
Does that mean that we are not protected by the members of the BPS - I do not believe that all people members handle situations in the same manner as I do believe it will depend on their training and experiences in real life.  
 
Thank You to those of you who face the risks every day to protect us and to those of you who choose to have a title and ignore details - I will pray for you to gain some wisdom and that God may guide you in your conduct while performing the duties of your employment.  
 
I will pray that you never have to open a closed file to address issues related to prior death threats. For a man to utter death threats towards a female in the presence of other professionals - leaves me to wonder on that man's mental stability. Especially when that man later admits in a provincial court to having physically assaulted and abused the female during an extended marriage.  
Do we question why did the female stay or do we deal with death threats and handle threats as serious?????  
 
 
 

Healthy Hugs

1/17/2013 3:10:49 PM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
Recommended Viewing - Movie

If you are looking for a good movie - you may wish to source and view the movie entitled "Courageous" a very touching and heart warming story - I believe it was released in 2011. This very relevant movie - may have an impact for you like no other movie!  
 

Billy Jack

1/17/2013 10:31:20 PM
Member since:
Jun 2012
Total posts:165
Protection Orders

As far as I know protection orders are a one sided story given to a official at which time no facts are checked. It's a very special type of order for the sole purpose to protect victims that may otherwise may not have proof of victimization to provide to authorities. I believe there are times when these special types of orders are abused. Officials in a precarious position to take everything at face value must be a arduous job.  
 
Me, I have a weakness for women in trouble, and tend to want to believe a person wouldn't make up stories of domestic violence. And that has been a detraction of my own strengths.  
 
 
 
Edited by Loco, 2013-01-17 22:33:59

Healthy Hugs

1/22/2013 10:21:42 AM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
Re Loco

  
Loco said "As far as I know protection orders are a one sided story given to a official at which time no facts are checked. It's a very special type of order for the sole purpose to protect victims that may otherwise may not have proof of victimization to provide to authorities. I believe there are times when these special types of orders are abused. Officials in a precarious position to take everything at face value must be a arduous job.  
 
Me, I have a weakness for women in trouble, and tend to want to believe a person wouldn't make up stories of domestic violence. And that has been a detraction of my own strengths.  
 
 
 
Edited by Loco, 2013-01-17 22:33:59"

Protection Orders - One sided - no facts checked - well if written statement of "death threats" provided to authorities and a witnesses testimony in a court of law is not enough to validate information then I am not sure what does!  
 
"A weakness for women in trouble" - Don't minimize an incredible strength of character please.  
 
Message of YWCA Westman's Women's Shelter - and re-yped here for your reading -  
 
""An invitation to Men  
We know most of you would never beat your wife, your lover or any woman. We live and work with you. We love and respect you. Your are our sons, fathers, uncles, husbands, brothers, companions, friends and lovers.  
 
But there are men who are violent. Children learn about fear, brutality and humiliation from them. These men destroy families in the privacy of their own homes and shatter the lives of innocent strangers.  
 
The next time you hear a man degrade a woman or say he's going to show her who's boss.....  
 
Tell him that beating and abusing a woman is wrong. Tell him that you handle your anger and aggression differently. You talk things out when you have differences with your partner.""  
 
 
Loco - you say "has been a detraction of my own strengths" I don't think it is a detraction but rather a great strength of your character!  

Healthy Hugs

1/22/2013 10:54:29 AM
Member since:
Nov 2012
Total posts:314
Death Threats - Serious

  
RosieGirl said "In life I have learned or heard two very valuable statements - There are people who will speak up and will subject themselves to be criticized (angry, loon, needing psychiatric help, counseling needed) such as on some of these posts - but then their are those who choose to say and do nothing - and hey they will not be subjected to criticism or being accused of having done wrong.  
 
So as I reflect on some of these posts I do not regret for one minute in having started this discussion as it has brought out some interesting comments towards the poster - but the poster simply wrote of actual incidents and circumstances for which she was of the know.  
 
Does it really matter what the person's name is? Does it really matter what the poster's name is?  
 
What does matter is how death threats are handled and how maybe not all citizens of the city of Brandon were aware of how one incident was handled - not quite the same as what was aired on a news release by the news media personnel Const. Ron Burgess or what is available for print on their website.  
 
Does that mean that we are not protected by the members of the BPS - I do not believe that all people members handle situations in the same manner as I do believe it will depend on their training and experiences in real life.  
 
Thank You to those of you who face the risks every day to protect us and to those of you who choose to have a title and ignore details - I will pray for you to gain some wisdom and that God may guide you in your conduct while performing the duties of your employment.  
 
I will pray that you never have to open a closed file to address issues related to prior death threats. For a man to utter death threats towards a female in the presence of other professionals - leaves me to wonder on that man's mental stability. Especially when that man later admits in a provincial court to having physically assaulted and abused the female during an extended marriage.  
Do we question why did the female stay or do we deal with death threats and handle threats as serious?????  
 
 
 
"

On Friday, January 18th, 2013 Brandon Sun - page A8 - News - "Court to rule on woman who tried to hire hit man" - Ottawa Ontario - The Canadian Press -  
"Her testimony detailing her former partner's violence and threats, as well as her ongoing fear and efforts to secure aid from 911 and police, was accepted without reservations by the judges. It shows that her actions were not voluntary in any meaningful sense and should not be punished."  
 
On Saturday, January 19th, 2013 Brandon Sun - pg A10 - News - Supreme Court - "Stay of proceeding for abused wife - by Mike Blanchfield - The Canadian Press -  
 
Justices Louis LeBel and Thomas Cromwell wrote in the ruling -  
"There is also the disquieting fact, that on the record before us, it seems that the authorities were much quicker to intervene to protect Mr. Ryan than they had been to respond to her request for help in dealing with his reign of terror over her"  
 
In that article published January 19th, 2013 - it is also written -  
"The court also highlighted the fact that the RCMP did not adequately respond to her numerous calls for help."  
 
Questions - Calls to 911 - is the lack of the RCMP responding or attending to such calls your understanding of how such should be handled.  
It is important to realize that calls to 911 are listed on telephone bills so wonder how many times she called and they ignored or did not attend to the calls?  
 
Once again - Death Threats - Serious?  
 
For those of you who choose to insist that the poster needs psychiatric help, counseling, calling her a loon, posting to get attention -  
 
Did it ever occur to you that the poster speaks of actual experiences and her purpose/vision in posting is to possibly not have another human being be ignored by the so called professionals or members of the judicial system to minimize information - statements, or even close files rather than act on information.  
What's more important - the safety of citizens or the closing of files.  
 
Why are there so many vigils held across the country each year???  
 
Once again - are Death Threats - Serious in your opinion and should they be acted upon?  
 

 
Page< Prev12


  Get E-mail/text alerts for this discussion    
Bookmark and Share
This thread has gone more than 90 days without a reply and has been closed as a result. Please feel free to start a new topic should you feel it is warranted.

   

 

Current Discussions

 
 
 

Classified Ads

 
 

Blogs

 
 

Local Business Directory

 
 
Atom-Jet Seeding Openers
Used Atom-Jet Seeding openers for sale by manufacturer. In good condition and prices to sell. CNH, Morris Edge-on, Single Shoot and more. Call (204) 728-8590 and ask for Melody-Anne. More..
Roofing
Our firm specializes in asphalt and steel roofs that are beautiful yet functional. Our team bring passion and enthusiasm to every project. From start to finish, we have you covered. Serving Westman and area More..
Christmas Catering
Christmas Buffet $25.95 per person Menu can be found on our website More..