Simonwalcal said "Most areas in town are based on copper or coax, so quite alot. Maybe if you could convince a whole neighborhood however, it could be manageable.
Also, this is why the whole "Fibe TV" thing annoys me ever so slightly. Almost seems like false advertising. Maybe Fibe TV . . .to the node.
Anyway, I haven't noticed any internet issues of late. A bit of pixilation in the cable stream at times, but also on a TV that's fairly far from the main terminal. Nothing to noticable.
Downtown.
Edited by Simonwalcal, 2019-01-14 00:12:49"
That in its self is also not true then. Fibe TV to the node doesnt exist.
All copper areas for Bell are fed via Fiber to the Node, correct, but the network card is at that location. So nothing is converted to IPTV until in a customers house and the modem deciphers IPTV from standard internet.
So saying fibe tv to the node is not correct. I personally don't like the Fibe TV and Fibe Internet because too many people magically see the missing "R" and think they are getting fiber to the home.
SHEBEAR - Copper has limitations on bandwidth and overall throughput due to distance and quality of the cables. Fiber however, technically has no limitations except for the equipment on either end of it. Its the same end user modems provided as on copper so that 1gbps plan you have could end up being 25mbps up to maybe 300mbps depending on the device and wifi interference.