myhandleistrain said "I played fastball with a busker in the '80's. His gig was juggling while riding a unicycle... interesting, for sure. I asked him if he made any money. He said he did alright. I asked him if he paid taxes... nope. Again, with all due respect, it may be very talented people busking, but personally, I really don't see the difference between them and respectable panhandlers. When I see a busker, I'm reminded of when I travel to Mexico and visit the markets. Some really talented street musicians, artists and performers there, but even they admit it is their livelyhood. Albeit doing something they love, but it is for an income. To those who get enjoyment from buskers, good on you! I tend to avoid them, as I do in Mexico. "
While I understand you position, I just wanted to point out a few things:
1. When the unicyclist fastball player says he doesn't pay taxes on the money he made on his act, that's not because it's not taxable, but because he neglected to claim it. Money earned busking is most certainly taxable, as are other types of irregular income such as tips. And unless that's their sole source of income, they probably *would* have to pay tax on it as their overall income would be above personal exemption level (I'm assuming).
Technically, a pan handler would also be taxable on the money he collects, but probably is below the taxable threshold (i.e. less than the personal exemption) so no worries there.
2. A busker in a tourist area in Mexico, with the (comparatively) rich gringos abound, probably makes a good living from busking. I don't think you can fairly compare it to someone here that does it in their off hours primarily as a creative outlet.
3. If we assume your assertions are correct - they are really no more than talented panhandlers - why would you begrudge them for doing something they love for money? Isn't that the ideal, doing a job we love in exchange for money?? LOL