So took a drive down this block for fun.
Had the impression from this post that the block is baby's-bottom smooth which isn't the case. Definitely pavement for part of the block, another part of it is like a lot of side roads after the conditions of the last couple weeks.... essentially one lane down the middle and then an icy-snowy mogul course for the rest of the width of the road. I live in a completely different area but having run into situations on similar streets recently where oncoming cars have to try to find a way to pull off to the side to allow other traffic through I have no problem with some of the already allocated snow budget going towards this sort of thing.
A little exercise to *rough* the tax impact of what's been brought up.
I pulled up the 2016 budget documents on the city site at
http://brandon.ca/budget/2016-budget
Cant seem to find a date on them to know just how current they are but they should give enough of an idea for the purpose of roughing numbers.
If we go on the assumption that this is out of snow removal, in those documents the entire snow removal budget for a full calendar year is showing as $635,000. That's 1.46% in comparison to the amount that's collected by property tax city-wide. I plugged in the address of what looks to be one of the bigger homes on that block into the property tax calculator on the city site and it said to be about $1600. 1.46% of that is a contribution of a little over $23 from that home's property tax bill towards a full year of city-wide snow clearing. I have no way to know how much of that full year $23 would go toward clearing one block of one street from one weather event but I'm going to guess you'd have to find a way to cut a nickel into pieces to measure it. Then you'd have to get into how many of your neighbours and people that use the street to get to the hospital don't mind their piece of a nickel going toward getting your street closer to babys-bottom status which is why I don't envy being in the position of folks having to make these decisions!
At the same time I'm personally not a fan when someone in blanket fashion says to not share a concern with other members in a post. Its entirely possible that the same person raises the same thing directly with the powers that be via councillor or city department but still wish to have a discussion with others.
Some may like it, others not.... but raising a concern in this kind of environment is a reasonable part of a democracy and people should feel free to have those conversations. If the odd concern comes across as a nitpick/sensationalistic rant then it might hurt the odd person's credibility in the eyes of some, but thats a choice they'll make when they give an honest assessment of whatever issue they're throwing out there for discussion and then folks have a chance to debate it on as many facts as possible.
Edited by Adam, 2016-02-02 16:15:07