Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 5038
balance
2/3/2020 at 11:03 AM
I agree there needs to be a balance, and how that would be struck is not clear. Obviously, the minister interviewed himself is unsure how this would be accomplished. With television it's simpler, but the Internet vastly complicates things. I'm not sure how what the report proposes would be accomplished without blocking certain sites, and again the question of who decides what's right and what's "fake news"?
I'm reading a very interesting book right now about Trump and the cultus that surrounds him. While the author clearly has an anti-Trump agenda (and he states as much in the opening pages in case there was any confusion, lol), I find a lot of what he has to say about the role media plays to be spot-on.
One of the defining characteristics of a legitimate, trusted news sources is the fact they publish errata. Legitimate news sources will say, "we were wrong", or "we got the facts wrong" and try to correct it. It doesn't happen too often (part of journalistic integrity is to try to get it right the first time), but it does happen occasionally. But a lot of the alt-facts news sources won't publish errata. They either insist that their version of the facts are correct (even in the face of overwhelming evidence otherwise), or they will ignore it and pretend it never happened.
The author levels a lot of criticism against the likes of Breibart and Fox News that I think he applies unfairly to them (because I see some of the same things on CNN etc), but on that particular aspect I think he's spot-on.