DeliveryMan said "I'm not really invested in any of this recycling/landfill stuff but when I do get into it with the recycling brigade I tell them "There are 3 R's in the recycling manifesto (Reduce/Reuse/Recycle)and if we put as much effort into the first 2 we wouldn't need blue bins" The reason we recycle so much and why everyone gets behind it is it's an easy way to basically do nothing while giving us the feeling that we're doing enough. I don't recycle newspaper because I read digital editions on my iPad, don't recycle water bottles because I drink tap water, and on and on...
So I agree with your idea in a broader sense but don't see it happening in anyway. A more practical solution would be something like the carbon tax...instead of 5 cents charge 25 cents for plastic bags...give people the illusion that they're choosing to use reusable bags. (Have you ever been behind someone who found out that they had to pay 5 cents for the plastic bags, just spent $3 on a bottle of sugar water but damned if they'll PAY for a plastic bag.) "
The triad of "reduce-reuse-recycle" is in ranked order. It was designed like that for a reason. Ideally, there should be nothing to recycle because it's been reduced or reused anyway. Alternative, you can insert the word "rot" into the mantra, where you compost what you are able, ideally in situ so reduce transport costs and emissions.
It's been in the news recently that barges of Canadian garbage AKA recycling have been turned away from places like the Philippines and Malaysia. We're not even processing our own recycling, instead it gets shipped abroad and turned into cheap, non-recyclable products.
I also have issue with putting feces in the landfill, whether it be from pets (dog poop or cat litter) or people (i.e. diapers). Ideally, that should all be going into the sanitary sewer so it can be treated instead of risking the spread of pathogens.