"back in my day!...grumble...grumble"
8/10/2023 at 6:56 PM
Farmergeorge said "1: I wouldn’t mention an employers or business name as that would be a breach of confidentiality.
2: I was employed in England so you wouldn’t recognize the workplace anyway.
3:The union representation model is old fashioned and outdated in a modern work environment. It’s notable that recently unions have been struggling with membership rejecting deals agreed during negotiations with employers.
I believed in keeping employment details private between myself and my employer. In one dealership that was a requirement. That policy never hurt me.
Edited by Farmergeorge, 2023-08-10 10:34:45"
You posts show nothing but an anti-union stance without having an understanding of the dispute being discussed or the collective bargaining practice in general.
You make claims that unions are outdated and no longer needed yet there's factual data showing a direct correlation of wage stagnation and the drop in unionized workforce saturation.
Organized labour helps drive wage rates and benefits for all, not the kindness of employers. You can be as "pie in the sky" as you want thinking that individuals negotiating wage rates with their employers is a better model than collective bargaining.
Unions are one of the main forces in changes to health and safety laws to protect workers. Every major union lobbies for worker protections while many employers push for de-regulation on all aspects of safety. Anything to help drive profit.
You make note that unions struggle with memberships rejecting deals that are agreed to during bargaining. What point are you making? This is what collective bargaining is about. During bargaining, agreements made are tentative only, pending ratification by the membership in a democratic process. When a negotiating team brings a package to the membership it can be presented several ways....
1) here's a tentative agreement, your bargaining team thinks its fair and we support it
2) here's a tentative agreement, your bargaining team thinks the employer has not been fair enough and we do not support it but want the membership to decide
3) here's a final offer from the employer, there are items in the package that were not tentatively agreed to but the employer wants to force them through
4) not really to same thing but the negotiating team can decide to not present the offer to the membership if they feel the company has not brought anything of value to the table.
I don't usually chime in on here but it rubs me the wrong way when people make uninformed comments.