Lawsuit with Mr.Lube and Direct Automotive
6/14/2024 at 3:12 AM
In 2021, I had an oil change on my Ram truck with 32,000 Kms, it was completed by Mr.Lube in Brandon, 18th and Rosser. Shortly after, my truck engine seized. It was determined by Chrysler that the regulating valve on the filter was broken, lodged and starved the engine of oil. Chrysler voided my warranty on my vehicle due to technician negligence.
After months of arbitration, Mr. Lube agreed to put in a used engine, and designated to have it installed by Direct Automotive on Wall St, in Winnipeg. Refusing to put in a new engine, I was reassured by both companies, in writing, that they would mirror the warranty and remaining duration I had on the previous engine, by accepting the used engine. As Direct Automotive stated, putting me “in a better situation than prior to this unfortunate situation”, this used engine only had 3,995 Kms on it.
Since receiving my truck back in May of 2022, I have had one problem after another. No freon in the air conditioner, tensioner sensor and belts needing to be replaced, 4x4 grinding/rubbing due to brake lines not being properly secured, alternator tearing off belts and breaking brackets, vehicle needing to be towed on three separate occasions, starter needing replacement, after the vehicle sitting for months, the battery needed to be replaced and a coolant leak. Currently, my Truck has 47,410 kms and is in a non-drivable condition.
Mr. Lube refused to help with any of these repairs. Direct Automotive only offered to put in freon with no technician charge and charged me $277 for the freon, claiming that the original engine did not have Freon, which is not true. Direct automotive refused to give me any information about the engine installed, claiming I was not their customer and that Mr Lube is the customer. I never received any communication back regarding the used engine from Mr Lube or Direct Automotive, despite making repeated attempts. After multiple unsuccessful attempts of communication with Mr. Lube’s representative, he eventually answered my call when I reached out blocking my number from call display. During this call, Mr. lube’s representative admitted to getting my email, discussing the matter with Direct Automotive and assured to contact me after further discussion with Direct Automotive. Neither company reached out.
When I learned that there is a statute of limitations in civil law of 2 years, I became worried that both companies may be attempting to ignore me to ensure I would have no legal recourse. I retained a lawyer and have begun the civil litigation process. Unfortunately, the legal process is lengthy and costly, in the meantime I am still without a working truck, paying $700 monthly loan payments, unable to afford another vehicle. Both companies claim that they have no responsibility to repair or replace my vehicle and state in legal documents that if their company is found liable they intend to counter sue the other.
Going on Year 3, this ordeal has been a complete nightmare. I feel that Mr Lube has taken advantage of a single, working mother. This situation has had detrimental effects on my work, family life, mental health and finances. I’m sharing my story because it might help push these companies to do the right thing: as well as to caution others. Although I am incredibly discouraged, I am hopeful that my lawyer can present the evidence and facts of my case clearly. Maybe my story can save someone else the absolute torment of going through what I have experienced, it helps make the fight worthwhile!