| | Blade said "| | Fishin Guy said "Nice to be removed. It is hard to see foot traffic coming from the university on to the crossings. Plus too it would open up the view to the university. Green space will still be there, just in grass.
People want to start protesting hedges.....we have developments that clear all vegetation from the area then build condos, only to plant baby trees that will take decades to reach the sizes that were originally there. Hence why we have water run off problems now. Yet you never see anyone protesting to save the trees. " |
|
|
Well with this thinking I guess we will have to remove all the hedges in town so you can see foot traffic coming. There is a sidewalk in front of the university that foot traffic has to cross before it gets to the crosswalk, your comment doesn't make any sense.
Hmmm so now you say don't remove the trees in new developments because this causes water run-off problems....probably more so because of the earthwork movement that causes drainage problems not tree removal. Also why the concern about decades to replace the trees when it will also takedecades to replace that hedge? " |
|
|
I have seen students coming from the university walk out from the hedges and there is a whole what 4-5 feet of sidewalk before they cross onto the road from the sidewalk. Some just keep walking thinking that cars have seen them and will stop. Not all walk down the sidewalk. Nothing against bushes, why not have them smaller like the Co-op gas bar on 18th st then?
Stripping of the trees is not the only problem of water drainage, I know that. Mature trees can suck up hundreds of gallons of water. What I hate is they strip all the trees in a development then force you to plant x amount of greenery when you build.