3wildboyz said "I *highly* disagree on it forming a significant part of many households. We get less than $200/month and have 3 children under the age of 18. I would lean more
Towards those that rely on the CTB as a significant source of income are likely not home buyers as it would be quite difficult to save a down payment with a rather low monthly household income. "
I used to work for CRA back when it was CCTB - believe me, it makes a significant part of many households. If you only get $200 with 3 children, you have a fairly large household income to begin with. But the thresholds are surprisingly high, and with more children the amount increases quite a bit.
You would be surprised how many of those are homeowners. The path to home ownership isn't always linear.
Some of these families might be divorced parents who retain the family home after separation.
Some scrimp and save to buy, trying for a better life for their kids.
Some had 2 incomes when they bought their home, but opted to have a parent stay at home and therefore eliminated an income (with the CCB helping make that possible).
Some are new Canadians with multiple generations living in the same household, each contributing to make the payments.
Some get extra CCB money because they have a disabled child, and it helps provide them with a better quality of life.
So it is possible, for many families, for the CCB to make up a significant part of their household income, to still be homeowners, and not necessarily be classed as "low-income", or even if they are to still be home owners.