Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4956
Should be a way to protect one property
5/29/2016 at 7:07 AM
When I look at society I sometimes see more laws to protect those who break laws. If I were in a store and saw someone stealing and got involved physically I could likely be charged with assault, you put your hands on someone you stand the chance of being charged with assault. I even wonder about store employees if they were to try and restrain a person who was leaving the store with unpaid goods are they allowed to touch a person or are they also at risk of an assault charge.
Now we go to a part that I consider interesting and may contain an answer, store security personel, they seem to be able to take a hands on approach to restraining and detaining thieves, not sure how much force they are allowed to use, but they sem to be allowed some physical force.
Now let''s take this to maybe the next higher level, armoured car personel. I don''t think that they are police but do carry weapons and are allowed to discharge those weapons in public to prevent a theft from taking place.
The reason I brought these points up is that over the years I have had different discussions with different Mounties about theft on the farm and have been told what I can do and what I can''t do, right down to the point of where and when I can use deadly force. The idea of deadly force may be a bit of a shock to some, but it does apply, if you don''t believe me ask a Mountie.
Back to my points about security personel. Many police forces are unable to provide proper policing of rural areas because of cutbacks made by different levels of government, these cutbacks have left larger areas and less manpower, and I doubt that this issue will be addressed.
In closing I''m saying that goverent has caused us a problem, so why not allow us to take training so that we can protect what is ours. If security personel are allowed to legally use physical force, and armoured car personel are allowed deadly force, why not us.
Read the book Animal Farm many years ago, and at the very end was the statement that we are all equal, but some are more equal than others, wonder if this applies when looking at rural problems.
Edited by don brown, 2016-05-29 07:12:16