Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4956
Interesting article
8/28/2016 at 6:41 AM
Enjoyed the link, but wonder why the professor of anthropology failed to realize that this is not something new.
If we go back and look at the earliest societies, or communities, one would see the same thing, there where tasks given to people who in reality served very little purpose. The earliest communal groups of people sought food, clothing and shelter for it's members, and members were expected to contribute, this gave them the right to be part of the community. As the world of production changed, and those who produced anything began producing more than was needed by their own communal group the barter system evolved, which led to new ideas of what was needed to expand trade. The barter system led to money which led to commercialism. We have a system that must produce jobs that pay money so that the whole thing doesn't collapse, and with a growing global population the task of creating productive jobs becomes more difficult, if one factors in the competive factor of different standards of living in different parts of the world.
Just my opinion, but I think we have the largest level of unnessary jobs in the countries with the highest standards of living. I have always had this hang up with the idea of critical mass, which means any model will collapse at a certain point, have a feeling that it applies to societies that continue to create jobs which don't really add to the economies of countries by new production and really only adds to an increase in unit cost of new production.