| | Nordberg said "| | IMO said "| | ~BooBoo~ said "I was reading an add here on ebrandon to do with renting a unit and part of the stipulations to be able to obtain a lease is submitting a drug test to the landlord and furthermore agreeing to random drugs tests after the lease is signed.
My question is, can a landlord leagally make their tenants submit to random drug tests to maintain their place of residency?
BTW I am not a drug user, I just find it interesting that a landlord is trying to do that. I can understand employers doing it, but I couldn't find anything in the residential landlord tenant act on this subject. Is this legal? My curiosity became peaked after reading that.
I can understand landlords wanting to protect their properties but honestly, not all drug users are bad people who throw parties or damage properties.
Edited by ~BooBoo~, 2015-07-31 21:06:18" |
|
|
The Landlord / Tenant Rules are kind of vague. Although it doesn't specifically say that they can ask for random drug tests, it also doesn't say that they can't. Same with a criminal record check.
I can see what the landlord is saying by wanting to screen out people who use drugs. It may not necessarily have to do with parties but more or less the fact that they don't want the smell in their house. As a home owner, I don't want anybody smoking in my house period. And if the landlord has children, its their right to make sure that type of thing is not around their children.
Additionally, the tenancy act states that landlord can implement any additional rules that they so choose for tenancy within their home, providing they do not conflict with the act itself.
At the end of the day it comes down to morals vs legals. Legally, they can ask for it. Morally, it depends if they can justify it by keeping their home and property and children from the exposure of that thing, by it drugs or people with a criminal record.
Is there a link to view this add? Edited by IMO, 2015-08-03 11:32:16" |
|
|
I will preface this with the statement that I'm not a lawyer, so I could definitely be wrong.
Just because the residential tenancies act doesn't say anything doesn't mean that it would be legal. My guess is that other legislation about discrimination, federal and provincial, would apply here. Often addiction is considered a health issue, and in many areas discriminating on the basis of a health issue would be illegal.
Privacy laws would also come i to play, as well as guarantees against unreasonable search, section 8 of the Charter.
8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.
My guess would be that if this isn't illegal, it is really pushing the line between legal and illegal. Edited by Nordberg, 2015-08-03 11:45:47" |
|
|
I am not a lawyer nor am I a police officer. You make a lot of good points in your statement. However, I do not believe discrimination can apply to illegal activity.
Section 8 of the charter is part of the legal section, and states:
"Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure "(Quote)
Although it doesn't specify, I believe it pertains to after arrest or during arrest / detention.
Not saying that the landlord is right or wrong in the situation, but at the end of the day, if it goes before the tenancy board, I believe (In my opinion) that the tenancy board would side with the landlord saying the landlord is within their right (legally) to protect their home, property, family and possession from anybody whom they feel would pose a threat for any reason and may do so, by any means necessary (within reason) and that asking for a clean criminal record and clean drug test falls within the boundaries of reason. Much like a landlord may ask for references and a credit check. Although the issue at hand is not references or a credit check, it is still a check the landlord may have done, at their discretion.
Prior to allowing admittance as a tenant, the landlord may actually check the Court of the Queens Bench Wedsite (the url is
http://www.jus.gov.mb.ca/) and investigate the person on their own accord for certain factors which may limit said person from becoming an tenant in the afore mentioned home.
However, all of that being said, the tenancy act does say that any activity which may bring harm to the home, can result in the person being evicted on a 72 hour notice (I think) and I believe criminal activity can be on a 24 hour notice. The legislation would need to be checked to verify
But again, not a cop and not a lawyer.
Edited by IMO, 2015-08-03 12:26:16