| | Cheezies said "My son took his drivers Ed and test within the last year. He too was told the same as jj123. And was told he would fail if he did stop for a pedestrian that wasn't at a crosswalk. And he would be at fault if rear -ended. So weird that these are so conflicting. Any drivers Ed instructors/testers on here have any answers.
Even though I know the op is right and I think the lady coming back and confronting her needs to get some anger mgmt courses, I would have a hard time stopping at that intersection safely at times. If I was driving south on 26th no problem stopping, but if I was driving north on 26th at that intersection it is on a slope. Traffic coming from behind may not have time to stop behind me as they may not see me till too late coming over that slope. Especially in winter. Maybe more harmful to me and the pedestrian.
This little hill/slope thing in that location was the perfect cover to surprise motorists in check stops for many years.
So I will stop when it is safe, or if the pedestrian leaves me no choice and starts to cross.
As a pedestrian I would walk one block down to 26th & Vic and cross at the lights. But that's just me.
" |
|
|
im wondering if its the "safe" to stop part that may be up for debate.
if the pedestrian was wanting to cross in a place that was unsafe to the driver then the instructor could say that safety is the reason
i agree that it seem contrary to what MPIs handbook and what i was taught says
i do have a driver instructor book, ill see if i can find more info on that