| | Starhc said "We have plenty of wealth in this nation, but it is concentrated in a very, very, very, very tiny percentage of the population. So what a handful of people have is equal to what the other 11 million people have.
While I agree with the principle, it is way out of hand. For one, we don't have 'half' the population working and not paying and the other half paying for it. Nobody is talking about legislating the wealthy out of their money - make no mistake, they will still be very, very, very wealthy even if a fraction of their income is used to provide social services for those with the most need. The needy outnumber the wealthy but it does not take much of their wealth to address that problem. Check out the actual distribution vs. what people perceive or think is fair. What is actual is so far away from what we perceive and think is fair. People can still be successful and extremely wealthy. There will always be poor people. But the extremes are what is keeping everyone in between - the actual majority of the population (I will jump to assume, that means most of us here...) people from being as successful and stable as we should be.
The problem most people have with the poor people is that they take more than they contribute. I am only asking that people consider for a moment who *else* is gaining far much more than they contribute to our country, and at what cost to the rest of us?
And then, what party or government actually has an idea to address it? The answer there is, none of them because the citizens in the country are not asking them to. We need to start looking in the right direction to solve these problems because the middle class is getting stretched very thin. Of course we don't like it when expanding social programs is on the agenda. It feels like we're already doing more than enough and no progress is being made.
" |
|
|
Have you ever sat on a downtown bench and notice the people walking by, do you look and wonder to yourself "what is there story"?
I have often found myself speaking to the ones that I saw on a regular basis. The homeless for instance are that way because they came upon hard times yet others have chosen that way of life. Meanwhile the "snobs" don't have the time or patience to understand others situations unless it will benefit themselves.
Housing for instance, the occupants of one home may have found themselves on hard times due to a breakup, one parent "usually the mother" is raising the children alone, they maybe driving a old beat up car, working while the kids are in school. Meanwhile the next home rides the wave of being looked after, going to the food banks, collecting assistance as well as even working under the table and not claiming it. Driving a newer vehicle and refusing to lift a finger to find work, where they can eventually get out of housing as well as off assistance. Then as their children grow older they find they are in housing and on assistance. A endless cycle that needs to be stopped. Especially the ones that still claim for children that have moved out of their home yet are still receiving money for them.