| | Cee Jay 55 said "| | Enfyre said "Seen this today-
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160414214826.htm "heavy cannabis use may impair the dopaminergic system, which could have a variety of negative effects on learning and behavior."
More on marijuana induced dopamine suppression and effects on motivation-
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-athletes-way/201307/does-long-term-cannabis-use-stifle-motivation
I'm sure that's no surprise to most people.
All drugs, pharmaceutical or plant based always have at least some degree of harmful side effect, and so it seems that marijuana is no exception. I'm not stating an opinion either way, other then that people should make an informed decision when choosing their treatment options. " |
|
|
Maybe, maybe not. I know a lot of people that smoke both medically and recreationally and most people can't tell they do. They are neither slow nor lazy.
However, alcohol has many, many more problems associated with it psychologically, physically, mentally, behaviorally, and financially. I could go on and on but pointless because alcohol is legal and accepted while weed is not legal... I am looking forward to the day it is.
I could also talk about highly addictive, debilitating, and at times lethal prescription drugs that are handed out whereas medical marijuana is neither addictive nor lethal but can replace some of those prescription drugs. Edited by Cee Jay 55, 2016-04-17 18:30:29" |
|
|
Pointing a finger at alcohol to justify marijuana is the old X is worse than Y therefore Y must be okay argument, it doesnt prove anything and is a distraction. But I agree things are a bit backwards there based on demonstrable harm.
Personal observations don't carry a lot of scientific weight, however, for the sake of a thought experiment I'll pay you the compliment of assuming that your right on your observations that these people you speak of are not lazy, BUT might they have accomplished more if they did not smoke pot?
How could we ever know? We would have to transcend out of time and space and view two alternate parallel universes, one in which they smoked up and one in which they didn't, all other variables aside, are you confident that there would be no difference in levels of accomplishment (and therefore contribution to society) between these doppelgangers? Even when real measurable evidence points to a different outcome?
That said, I'm not anti-marijuana, I'm just saying that people should make an informed decision when choosing to use it recreationly or medicinally.
While it's comparatively safe in relation to what else is available, its not [i]perfectly[/i] safe, and real evidence supports this assertion.